Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 54: Line 54:     
Is there a reason why this quote is featured in large letters at the top of the article? It's a perfectly correct statement (so there's no reason to point it out as an error), but it's not a very enlightening one (so it's not interesting enough to be the most prominent point of the article). If it's pointing out the folly in Obama's handling of this, I'm sure there are better quotes that we can use. This one is a perfectly reasonable and accurate thing to say. I would suggest alternative quotes, but I don't know what goal we're trying to achieve with them. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 00:31, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
 
Is there a reason why this quote is featured in large letters at the top of the article? It's a perfectly correct statement (so there's no reason to point it out as an error), but it's not a very enlightening one (so it's not interesting enough to be the most prominent point of the article). If it's pointing out the folly in Obama's handling of this, I'm sure there are better quotes that we can use. This one is a perfectly reasonable and accurate thing to say. I would suggest alternative quotes, but I don't know what goal we're trying to achieve with them. [[User:ChrisGT90|ChrisGT90]] 00:31, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Since another rig just blew today, that makes Obama's statement 0-2. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:36, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682

edits

Navigation menu