Changes

Also, sweeping generalizations about Hispanic and Asian women (not to mention the line "more yang than yin") can be offensive. [[User:Emba|Emba]] 10:08, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

Also, sweeping generalizations about Hispanic and Asian women (not to mention the line "more yang than yin") can be offensive. [[User:Emba|Emba]] 10:08, 31 July 2010 (EDT)

:::Emba, you haven't shown that Richard Dawkins should be treated with more respect and I find that quite humorous. I found your other complaints to be equally non-supported. Are you an atheist?  If so, why do atheists [[Essay: Atheism is a clown and it did not know it|have such a hard time supporting their contentions and worldview]]? [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:12, 9 September 2010 (EDT)

:::Emba, you haven't shown that Richard Dawkins should be treated with more respect and I find that quite humorous. I found your other complaints to be equally non-supported. Are you an atheist?  If so, why do atheists [[Essay: Atheism is a clown and it did not know it|have such a hard time supporting their contentions and worldview]]? [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:12, 9 September 2010 (EDT)

:::::Emba, tell you what.  Since [[Richard Dawkins]] considers [[intelligent design]] adherents to be creationist and since Dawkins debated [[Richard Dawkins' public refusal to debate creationists|John Lennox who holds to the position of intelligent design]], you can tell Richard Dawkins that I am willing to debate him on the subject of [[evolution]] so he can gain some of the machismo back that [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach|he lost in the events surrounding the Rabbi Boteach debate.]] I still think it would be better if he once again debated Rabbi Boteach though and Rabbit Boteach has graciously extended an invitation to debate him once more. By the way, can you tell me why [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach|Dawkins claimed he never debated Rabbi Boteach?]]  A debate which was videotaped. Was it because [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach|Dawkins lost the Dawkins-Boteach debate according to the college audience?]]  If you could gain some clarification concerning this matter through Mr. Dawkins, Conservapedia would be most indebted to you.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:32, 9 September 2010 (EDT)

:::::Emba, tell you what.  Since [[Richard Dawkins]] considers [[intelligent design]] adherents to be creationists and since Dawkins debated [[Richard Dawkins' public refusal to debate creationists|John Lennox who holds to the position of intelligent design]], you can tell Richard Dawkins that I am willing to debate him on the subject of [[evolution]] so he can gain some of the machismo back that [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach|he lost in the events surrounding the Rabbi Boteach debate.]] I still think it would be better if he once again debated Rabbi Boteach though and Rabbit Boteach has graciously extended an invitation to debate him once more. By the way, can you tell me why [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach|Dawkins claimed he never debated Rabbi Boteach?]]  A debate which was videotaped. Was it because [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach|Dawkins lost the Dawkins-Boteach debate according to the college audience?]]  If you could gain some clarification concerning this matter through Mr. Dawkins, Conservapedia would be most indebted to you.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:32, 9 September 2010 (EDT)

==This is strange to me==

==This is strange to me==