Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + + + +
thanks, keep up the good work
Please be sure you give citations and explain removal of already vetted facts. If you remove a citation, please replace it with another. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:33, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
Please be sure you give citations and explain removal of already vetted facts. If you remove a citation, please replace it with another. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:33, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
:I removed a broken link and the "facts" it supported. The site in question, even if the link worked, as for an obviously socialist group called the United States Institute for Peace. I don't think this is a reliable source by Conservapdia standards, but I could be wrong. The article as it stands basically accuses Pinochet of murdering thousands of innocent people, something communist apologetic liberals like to say but which has never been proved. The [[Pinochet]] article gives a much more accurate account than the Allende one, so it seems that one should to be edited for accuracy. In my opinion, Conservapedia shouldn't jump on the anti-Pinochet bandwagon like so many leftists in this country. I welcome your input in this area. [[User:AngusT|AngusT]] 16:26, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
:I removed a broken link and the "facts" it supported. The site in question, even if the link worked, as for an obviously socialist group called the United States Institute for Peace. I don't think this is a reliable source by Conservapdia standards, but I could be wrong. The article as it stands basically accuses Pinochet of murdering thousands of innocent people, something communist apologetic liberals like to say but which has never been proved. The [[Pinochet]] article gives a much more accurate account than the Allende one, so it seems that one should to be edited for accuracy. In my opinion, Conservapedia shouldn't jump on the anti-Pinochet bandwagon like so many leftists in this country. I welcome your input in this area. [[User:AngusT|AngusT]] 16:26, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
==Lindbergh==
Hi. Thanks for [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Best_of_the_public&curid=104391&diff=817382&oldid=813906&rcid=900986 pointing this out] about "Lucky Lindy". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:27, 15 September 2010 (EDT)