Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:     
However, my attempts at academic rigor have already become too dangerous. I have attempted to use the Bible to propose alternatives to YEC, and I am therefore a threat. [[User:Calcnerd314|Calcnerd314]] 07:51, 13 January 2008 (EST)
 
However, my attempts at academic rigor have already become too dangerous. I have attempted to use the Bible to propose alternatives to YEC, and I am therefore a threat. [[User:Calcnerd314|Calcnerd314]] 07:51, 13 January 2008 (EST)
−
  −
  −
  −
  −
== Separate Articles ==
  −
  −
In the spirit of avoiding further conflict, I would like to suggest that this article either be separated into two articles or that it be clearly partitioned so as to indicate the distinction between "the Church's official teaching on creation (or lack thereof)" and the "views of members of the Church." While the ''Humani Generis'' may be the most authoritative Church document on the matter, the fact that a number of prominent Catholics (e.g. Pope Benedict) have expressed skepticism of the idea that a literal interpretation of Genesis is not something to be dismissed, unless you are of the belief that any disagreement with any proclamation with the Church precludes you from being called Catholic. Other Church teachings actually negate this concept. <ref>http://www.ewtn.com/library/DOCTRINE/CONSC.TXT</ref>
      
== Separate Articles ==
 
== Separate Articles ==
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu