53
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 262:
Line 262: − − == AD/BC dates incorrect == − − I don't know whether or not this warrants inclusion in the article, but since the traditional AD and BC dates are known to be incorrect (with the actual birthdate for Jesus likely being some time BC), couldn't that be an argument for the use of CE and BCE by people who are Christian? I've used it before for that reason, and I know I'm in the minority in that respect, but I feel sort of awkward calling a date after Jesus' birth (or really any date, since Christ is eternal, but that's a different thing entirely) "Before Christ". [[User:CobaltFusion|CobaltFusion]] 08:05, 28 June 2010 (EDT)
Deleted my own edit because of changing opinions; I no longer felt my edit was relevant.
"A later edition (11th)" in the lede is confusing. Edition of what? What did the earlier edition say? Thanks! [[User:Keepscases|Keepscases]] 12:51, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
"A later edition (11th)" in the lede is confusing. Edition of what? What did the earlier edition say? Thanks! [[User:Keepscases|Keepscases]] 12:51, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
<references />
<references />
== Ab Urbe Condita ==
== Ab Urbe Condita ==