Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
456 bytes added ,  03:46, September 27, 2010
added cite
Line 1: Line 1:  
A [[party]] to a [[lawsuit]] acquires '''associational standing''' by showing that "(1) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (2) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization's purpose; and (3) neither the claims asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of the individual members in the [[lawsuit]]." ''McKinney v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury'', 799 F.2d 1544, 1550 n.13 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting ''Hunt'', 432 U.S. at 343).  
 
A [[party]] to a [[lawsuit]] acquires '''associational standing''' by showing that "(1) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (2) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization's purpose; and (3) neither the claims asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of the individual members in the [[lawsuit]]." ''McKinney v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury'', 799 F.2d 1544, 1550 n.13 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting ''Hunt'', 432 U.S. at 343).  
 +
 +
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] explained:
 +
 +
:An association has standing to sue or defend in such capacity, however, only if its members would have standing in their own right. See Food and Commercial Workers v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544,    (1996) (slip op., at 7-9); Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm'n, 432 U.S. 333, 343, 53 L. Ed. 2d 383, 97 S. Ct. 2434 (1977).
 +
 +
Arizonans for Official English v. Ariz., 520 U.S. 43, 65-66 (U.S. 1997)
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:standing]]
 
[[category:standing]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu