Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:  
Arizonans for Official English v. Ariz., 520 U.S. 43, 65-66 (1997).
 
Arizonans for Official English v. Ariz., 520 U.S. 43, 65-66 (1997).
   −
The first two prongs of the test above are constitutional, while the third prong is merely prudential (and thus can be altered by [[Congress]]):
+
The first two prongs of the test above are [[constitutional]], while the third prong is merely prudential (and thus can be altered by [[Congress]]):
    
:There are two ways in which ''Hunt'' addresses the Article III requirements of injury in fact, causal connection to the defendant's conduct, and redressability.  
 
:There are two ways in which ''Hunt'' addresses the Article III requirements of injury in fact, causal connection to the defendant's conduct, and redressability.  
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu