Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
documentation
Line 288: Line 288:     
:Your suggestion is interesting and the article by Keister appears to be legitimate.  Perhaps the weakness is a lack of weightier examples.  I welcome comments by others about this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:35, 25 September 2010 (EDT)
 
:Your suggestion is interesting and the article by Keister appears to be legitimate.  Perhaps the weakness is a lack of weightier examples.  I welcome comments by others about this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:35, 25 September 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I appreciate the need for examples, but Keister gives extensive references for this claim in his article.  I anxiously await the input of other editors.
 +
::Could you clarify how Jesus walking on water is related to wave-particle duality, and how the scripture demonstrates foreknowledge of this?  I think that showing foreknowledge of a phenomenon should be distinguished from merely documenting an instance of it.  The Bible describes the Sun, but that fact alone does not mean that it shows foreknowledge of the specific mechanisms of nuclear fusion.  --[[User:LanceS|LanceS]] 11:31, 27 September 2010 (EDT)
63

edits

Navigation menu