7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 295:
Line 295: + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 18:24, September 27, 2010
, 18:24, September 27, 2010→Wave particle Duality: new section
::: Will respond to your other question a bit later. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:20, 27 September 2010 (EDT)
::: Will respond to your other question a bit later. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:20, 27 September 2010 (EDT)
== Wave particle Duality ==
I have to disagree that the Bible passage that is included describes wave-particle duality, and therefore that this is scientific foreknowledge. The sentence "Particles are subject to gravity; waves are not." is not completely true, as sources of high gravity can affect waves. This, though is not my real concern.
My main concern is that, for Jesus to act like a wave, he would have to have been moving very fast. Using the De Broglie Theory of Matter, <math></math>λ=h/p
where λ is the wavelenght, h is Planck constant (ie, 6.63*10<sup>-34</sup>) and p is momentum (p=mv). Using that equation and some assumptions, Mass of about 70kg, 2ms<sup>-1</sup> walking speed (average walking speed is about 1 - 1.5 ms<sup>-1</sup>), this would give a wavelenght that is undetectable to human beings (~4.735*10<sup>-36</sup>), especially without modern equipment.
However, it would be possible for it to happen if the water had properties like that of custard. But as I said at the start, I do not think this is a piece of scienctific foreknowledge. If I am completely honest, it seems more like an attempt to make sciencetific theories appear to have been shown in the bible.
On a completely differnet point, the stars being unnumerable, I feel that any person at that time, that looked up to the sky at night could be able to make the assumption that the stars are unnumerable. Just because science hasn't confirmed something, doesn't mean it is not true. Science probably was unable to confirm something because the technology was not present at teh time. [[User:Griffirg|Griffirg]] 14:24, 27 September 2010 (EDT)