| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | In modern times, compass-and-straightedge constructions were rediscovered by [[Euler]], who resurrected them from the pages of his namesake's ''Elements'' and found that their simple geometric [[truth]]s were a pleasant diversion from the [[calculus wars]] then raging between the {{hs|Isaac|Newton}}ian British and the [[Leibniz]]ian German mathematical communities. In the twentieth century, compass-and-straightedge methods have become a popular form of [[recreational mathematics]], and the technique is taught as a one-week [[unit]] in many [[middle school]] [[math]] [[class]]es. | | In modern times, compass-and-straightedge constructions were rediscovered by [[Euler]], who resurrected them from the pages of his namesake's ''Elements'' and found that their simple geometric [[truth]]s were a pleasant diversion from the [[calculus wars]] then raging between the {{hs|Isaac|Newton}}ian British and the [[Leibniz]]ian German mathematical communities. In the twentieth century, compass-and-straightedge methods have become a popular form of [[recreational mathematics]], and the technique is taught as a one-week [[unit]] in many [[middle school]] [[math]] [[class]]es. |
| | | | |
| − | ==Unsolved problems== | + | ==Classical unsolved problems== |
| − | The Ancident Greeks solved all their problems with compass and straightedge. There were, however, three problems which they could not solve: [[cube|doubling the cube]], [[square|completing the square]], and [[angle|trisecting the angle]]. [[Pythagoras]] himself was said to have remarked that trisecting the angle was the hardest thing he had ever attempted. [[Archimedes]] attempted a "[[rationalism|rationalistic]]" approach to trisecting the angle, in which he repeatedly ''bisected'' the angle until the number of divisions became a multiple of 3; however, this does not work for most angles, and in any event it is only physically possible to bisect most angles seven or eight times, so Archimedes' approach does not [[scale]]. | + | The Ancident Greeks solved all their problems with compass and straightedge. There were, however, three problems which they could not solve: [[cube|doubling the cube]], [[squaring the circle]], and [[angle|trisecting the angle]]. [[Pythagoras]] himself was said to have remarked that trisecting the angle was the hardest thing he had ever attempted. [[Archimedes]] attempted a "[[rationalism|rationalistic]]" approach to trisecting the angle, in which he repeatedly ''bisected'' the angle until the number of divisions became a multiple of 3; however, this does not work for most angles, and in any event it is only physically possible to bisect most angles seven or eight times, so Archimedes' approach does not [[scale]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | These problems can't be solved with compass and straightedge; the analysis can be done with the help of [[Abstract Algebra]]. In short, starting with a fixed length ''L'', any two points that can be drawn by intersecting cicles and lines based on already existing points must lie at a distance that can be expressed as ''x L'', where ''x'' is a number whose expression uses only basic arithmetic operations and square roots - reciprocally, for every number ''x'' that can be thus expressed, it's possible to construct a line segment of length ''x L''. |
| | + | |
| | + | ''Squaring the circle'' is equivalent to drawing a line segment of length <math>\pi L\,</math>, which can't be done, because <math>\pi\,</math> is not an [[algebraic number]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | ''Doubling the cube'' and ''trisecting an angle'' are equivalent to solving irreducible [[cubic equations]], whose solutions can't be expressed with only square roots - cubic roots (of the real number 2, in the doubling of the cube, or of complex numbers, in the case of the trisection) are required. |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Plane Geometry]] | | [[Category:Plane Geometry]] |