13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 420:
Line 420: + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 16:15, September 29, 2010
, 16:15, September 29, 2010→Solar Fusion
Could someone add some numbers to this? For me, it sounds just wrong, and I couldn't find any source for it. It's something different from the [[Faint young Sun problem]], I suppose. [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 11:02, 28 June 2010 (EDT)
Could someone add some numbers to this? For me, it sounds just wrong, and I couldn't find any source for it. It's something different from the [[Faint young Sun problem]], I suppose. [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 11:02, 28 June 2010 (EDT)
:http://neutrino.aquaphoenix.com/un-esa/sun/sun-chapter5.html
:This article explains the life of the sun so far, with some great equations that explain the rate of H and He depletion in the solar fusion reaction. As you can see, the math supports a sun of at least 4.5 billion years old, with a life span that will extend for another 5 to 10 billion years.
:No doubt, Andy will chastise me for posting this, and demand that i be more open minded (ie. believe only what he believes and disregard "liberally biased math" in favor of the more biblically friendly "no real evidence at all")
== Geothermal Activity ==
== Geothermal Activity ==