Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  19:59, October 5, 2010
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
The [[Congress]]ional [[Democrat]]s and [[Obama administration]]'s efforts to favor [[UAW]] workers and New Car buyers (typically households with $60,000 plus in income<ref>http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/cash-for-clunkers-by-the-numbers/ </ref>) with subsidies from the [[United States Treasury]], has been an unmitigated disaster for working families,  and the poor.  As a result of the federal spending program, working families and the poor now are faced with an average price ''increase'' of 10.3% for Used Cars.
+
The [[Congress]]ional [[Democrat]]s and [[Obama administration]]'s efforts to favor [[UAW]] workers and New Car buyers (typically households with $60,000 plus in income)<ref>http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/cash-for-clunkers-by-the-numbers/ </ref> with subsidies from the [[United States Treasury]], has been an unmitigated disaster for working families,  and the poor.  As a result of the federal spending program, working families and the poor now are faced with an average price ''increase'' of 10.3% for Used Cars.
    
The government program mandated trade-ins be crushed, leading to a shortage of used vehicles and an increase in prices. This has occurred at a time when '''[[deflation]]''', or an overall drop in prices giving consumers more money to spend, has characterized the current economic environment.
 
The government program mandated trade-ins be crushed, leading to a shortage of used vehicles and an increase in prices. This has occurred at a time when '''[[deflation]]''', or an overall drop in prices giving consumers more money to spend, has characterized the current economic environment.
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,718

edits

Navigation menu