28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 577:
Line 577: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 22:38, April 2, 2007
, 22:38, April 2, 2007→Sex and wikipedia
::: "Aschlafly," I'm not certain what your point in attacking my edits (as well as my motives and my faith) was other than a sort of deflection from the point at hand. I can only assume you're not prepared to discuss the topic of ocnservapedia promoting sexual content reasonably. I wonder, however, if you might benefit more by examining your own actions and edits here rather than questioning my faith. I've made no secret that I don't beleive you can be properly labeled a conservative in any meaningful sense, but rather a radical. I'm fairly certain given your rabid defense of your own views you're not able to understand why I might think that. Be that as it may I've stated my opinion. Feel free to ignore it as is your habit to ignore anything that doesn't fit well into your narrow radical view. Have a pleasant day and good luck with this blog. [[User:Godman|Godman]] 15:23, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::: "Aschlafly," I'm not certain what your point in attacking my edits (as well as my motives and my faith) was other than a sort of deflection from the point at hand. I can only assume you're not prepared to discuss the topic of ocnservapedia promoting sexual content reasonably. I wonder, however, if you might benefit more by examining your own actions and edits here rather than questioning my faith. I've made no secret that I don't beleive you can be properly labeled a conservative in any meaningful sense, but rather a radical. I'm fairly certain given your rabid defense of your own views you're not able to understand why I might think that. Be that as it may I've stated my opinion. Feel free to ignore it as is your habit to ignore anything that doesn't fit well into your narrow radical view. Have a pleasant day and good luck with this blog. [[User:Godman|Godman]] 15:23, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
: Aschlafly, you seem to dodge legitimate responses and complaints alot. For example, your response to responses to point 5 in the archives. Also, your last 3 comments didn't actually defend your 'example of bias', but instead, attacked the person disagreeing with your point. (the 1st one attacked Godman's faith and edits, the 2nd one used sarcasm, which you seemed to abhor in a comment above that, and the most recent one called them liberals, (as if that were an insult) while completely ignoring their points. [[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 18:38, 2 April 2007 (EDT)