nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Neutrality (view source)
Revision as of 22:51, April 2, 2007
, 22:51, April 2, 2007Conservapedia Should Not Be Neutral On All Subjects
Ergo, Conervapedia will not, cannot, be 100% neutral on all subjects. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 18:49, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
<blockquote>
''This a proposed policy or guideline. It is not official, and does not have wide acceptance. Please regard it as tentative and formative.''
An encyclopedia which merits trust and respect will avoid taking sides on many or most controversies. When matters of fact or interpretation are in doubt, it will list all pertinent information and viewpoints, but avoiding drawing a conclusion.
On certain core issues, a conservative encyclopedia must take a stand. Matters of morality and ethics are paramount among these. A healthy respect for religion, particularly religious views held by large numbers of Americans, is also in order.
</blockquote>
Ergo, Conervapedia will not, cannot, be 100% neutral on all subjects by necessity. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 18:49, 2 April 2007 (EDT)