nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + − ::::I can point to [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly/Archive3#Pro-Christian.3F] [[User:Myk|Myk]] 19:33, 2 April 2007 (EDT)+
Conservapedia talk:Neutrality (view source)
Revision as of 00:01, April 3, 2007
, 00:01, April 3, 2007no edit summary
::: One need only look for conservative's edits. Every time he links to AiG it is about the truth is in the Bible and any science that contradicts that is wrong. I bet you can't do an article on [[radiocarbon dating]] with sources from[http://www.c14dating.com/] [http://science.howstuffworks.com/carbon-14.htm] [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/raddat2.html] without getting some AiG references that claim those methods are wrong because they give a date older than 4004 BC. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:17, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::: One need only look for conservative's edits. Every time he links to AiG it is about the truth is in the Bible and any science that contradicts that is wrong. I bet you can't do an article on [[radiocarbon dating]] with sources from[http://www.c14dating.com/] [http://science.howstuffworks.com/carbon-14.htm] [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/raddat2.html] without getting some AiG references that claim those methods are wrong because they give a date older than 4004 BC. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:17, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::::I can point to [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly/Archive3#Pro-Christian.3F] [[User:Myk|Myk]] 19:33, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
Andy's quote there seems highly reasonable to me. Let the user decide. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:01, 2 April 2007 (EDT)