Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
Talk:Restore Sanity rally (view source)
Revision as of 01:38, November 1, 2010
, 01:38, November 1, 2010It's old news at this point but if you have a clarifying edit then let's consider it.
::::::I don't know how you want me to change our Main Page. There weren't 215,000 nutcases and potheads there, I'm sure of that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:18, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
::::::I don't know how you want me to change our Main Page. There weren't 215,000 nutcases and potheads there, I'm sure of that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:18, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
:::::::Andy, the USA Today is liberal [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=USA_Today&diff=prev&oldid=451123 as ''you'' say]. If the USA Today has the equivalent of the "nutritional value of a meal at a fast food restaurant such as McDonalds", it's not at all compelling. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_News_Sources&diff=797358&oldid=796069 You acknowledge] Breitbart's status as one of the best news sources. I want you to report what the best news sources have to tell us. You're letting your agenda get in the way of trustworthiness. It's worrisome, that's all. [[User:KyleDD|KyleDD]] 21:25, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
:::::::Andy, the USA Today is liberal [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=USA_Today&diff=prev&oldid=451123 as ''you'' say]. If the USA Today has the equivalent of the "nutritional value of a meal at a fast food restaurant such as McDonalds", it's not at all compelling. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_News_Sources&diff=797358&oldid=796069 You acknowledge] Breitbart's status as one of the best news sources. I want you to report what the best news sources have to tell us. You're letting your agenda get in the way of trustworthiness. It's worrisome, that's all. [[User:KyleDD|KyleDD]] 21:25, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
:::::::: Kyle, I welcome a specific suggestion for editing (not rewriting) the Main Page. It's old news at this point but if you have a clarifying edit then let's consider it. By the way, do you know how many people Breitbart estimated were at the [[March for Life]]? I could thereby gauge his credibility on this issue.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:38, 31 October 2010 (EDT)