Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:     
::::::::::I have an open mind about this, but based on the above I don't find Breitbart to be any more credible than USA Today on this issue.  Add the complication that tens of thousands were at the rally to hear popular rock stars, and I'm not compelled to change the estimate.  If you can find more reliable estimates then let's discuss them.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:41, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
 
::::::::::I have an open mind about this, but based on the above I don't find Breitbart to be any more credible than USA Today on this issue.  Add the complication that tens of thousands were at the rally to hear popular rock stars, and I'm not compelled to change the estimate.  If you can find more reliable estimates then let's discuss them.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:41, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
 +
:::::::::::After publishing the amateur estimation by the reporter, the estimate which USA Today chose to report is the same 215,000 that Breitbart reported. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-11-01-rally01_ST_N.htm] If you have an open mind and are adamant about keeping crowd estimates in the article, wouldn't you change it to "Estimates have the crowd from 60,000 to 215,000". Could we agree on that? [[User:KyleDD|KyleDD]] 23:17, 31 October 2010 (EDT)
69

edits

Navigation menu