47
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 66:
Line 66: + +
→Conflicts between users
::::The article wrenches a joke out of context Rev. Falwell is making to an audience which criticizes real anti-Semites. It was strectch for this author to spew this garbage, and I see no reason anyone should repeat such obvious lies and distortions. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::::The article wrenches a joke out of context Rev. Falwell is making to an audience which criticizes real anti-Semites. It was strectch for this author to spew this garbage, and I see no reason anyone should repeat such obvious lies and distortions. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::I was crossing the line a bit with the calling you an anti-semite and not reading into another matter more closely before commenting on it, but i still maintain the opinion that the article should show both sides of the issue, perhapes weasel words would be more applicable in this situation. Also I still carry the opinion that Falwell only wants two things of my kind, that we convert to Christianity, or that we burn in hell. [[User:JamesLipton|JamesLipton]] 22:05, 2 April 2007 (EDT)