Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
physical explanations for other miracles?
Line 376: Line 376:     
: Thanks for your view, but miracles are probably best translated as "signs".  They do not conflict with nature, but instead provide a window into its true underlying basis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:02, 12 November 2010 (EST)
 
: Thanks for your view, but miracles are probably best translated as "signs".  They do not conflict with nature, but instead provide a window into its true underlying basis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:02, 12 November 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
::That's an interesting suggestion -- never heard anything like it before.  I don't buy it without some more evidence.  If you want to use this translation you need a good case that ''every'' miracle has some kind of physical explanation.  I am curious what you would suggest as naturalistic explanations for these "signs":
 +
* Calming the storm (Mark 4:35 etc). 
 +
:Perhaps foreshadows knowledge of chaos theory, as Jesus arranges an inverse butterfly effect?  By moving his pinky in just the right way he sets off air currents which calm the winds.
 +
* Various healing and resurrection miracles.
 +
:This has to be some kind of advanced medical technology -- any more specific suggestion?  Nanobots?
 +
* Coin in the fish's mouth (Matthew 17:24).
 +
:I've got nothing on this one. 
 +
* Cursing the fig tree (Mark 11:12)
 +
:I am not aware of any plant pathogens which act this quickly.
 +
We must also explain miracles performed by others.  For example:
 +
* Parting the Red Sea
 +
:What is the physics here?  I am curious about your suggestions for all of these events, as I have always understood miracles as being outside the realm of scientific explanation. --[[User:LanceS|LanceS]] 13:47, 12 November 2010 (EST)
63

edits

Navigation menu