Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 397: Line 397:  
:::The case of cursing the fig tree deserves particular attention, I think, because to my mind Jesus actually ''decreases'' order by killing the tree.  I have previously understood this miracle as a demonstration of the divinity of Jesus because of his control over nature.  How should this event be understood as a "sign"?
 
:::The case of cursing the fig tree deserves particular attention, I think, because to my mind Jesus actually ''decreases'' order by killing the tree.  I have previously understood this miracle as a demonstration of the divinity of Jesus because of his control over nature.  How should this event be understood as a "sign"?
 
:::I am intrigued by your suggestion and approach it with an open mind.  But without a specific naturalistic interpretation, a miracle is still a miracle, whether it increases order or not.  If a supernatural explanation is still required I fail to understand why it should be called a "sign". --[[User:LanceS|LanceS]] 20:01, 12 November 2010 (EST)
 
:::I am intrigued by your suggestion and approach it with an open mind.  But without a specific naturalistic interpretation, a miracle is still a miracle, whether it increases order or not.  If a supernatural explanation is still required I fail to understand why it should be called a "sign". --[[User:LanceS|LanceS]] 20:01, 12 November 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
::::"Sign" is a more customary translation than "miracle".  Beyond that, your criticism displays a [[double standard]]: why don't you require the same "physical explanation" before accepting [[quantum mechanics]]?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:14, 12 November 2010 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,203

edits

Navigation menu