Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)

Revision as of 23:23, November 13, 2010

265 bytes added ,  23:23, November 13, 2010
reply: what is valid at the atomic level is presumptively valid at larger scales also. Or would you observe an apple falling from a tree and then claim that says nothing about planetary motion?
Line 449: Line 449:     
To finish I would like to be removed as an editor on this site, and my account to be deleted, because I do not think I can add any logical input to this site, as it seems to disregard logic, and use the process of doublethink to assume the bible is logically sound, while disregarding and illogical things in it, search the net and you will find them.  [[User:Griffirg|Griffirg]] 14:50, 13 November 2010 (EST)
 
To finish I would like to be removed as an editor on this site, and my account to be deleted, because I do not think I can add any logical input to this site, as it seems to disregard logic, and use the process of doublethink to assume the bible is logically sound, while disregarding and illogical things in it, search the net and you will find them.  [[User:Griffirg|Griffirg]] 14:50, 13 November 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
: Griffirg, what is valid at the atomic level is presumptively valid at larger scales also.  Or would you observe an apple falling from a tree and then claim that says nothing about planetary motion?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:23, 13 November 2010 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,200

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/828059"

Navigation menu