Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Miracles: I doubt Isaac Newton would have insisted that something is impossible under the laws of nature as you do. Do you think you are better qualified than Newton to make such statements?
Line 410: Line 410:  
::Nevertheless, the feeding of five thousand people with a few loaves and fishes is clearly not normally possible. The laws of nature clearly show that water cannot be turned into wine any more than lead can be turned into gold and people are not able to walk on water. Jesus could perform such miracles because of the power God invested in him. Furthermore, the intense white, whiter than any bleach, radiant glow or ‘halo’ of Jesus and his clothing displays his Godliness and is not of natural origin. By explaining away those miracles as a skillful application of scientific foreknowledge reduces Jesus to the status of a gifted conjuror in possession of a collection of impressive party tricks. That is the kind of ‘logic’ atheists use to undermine the status of Jesus as the son of God.
 
::Nevertheless, the feeding of five thousand people with a few loaves and fishes is clearly not normally possible. The laws of nature clearly show that water cannot be turned into wine any more than lead can be turned into gold and people are not able to walk on water. Jesus could perform such miracles because of the power God invested in him. Furthermore, the intense white, whiter than any bleach, radiant glow or ‘halo’ of Jesus and his clothing displays his Godliness and is not of natural origin. By explaining away those miracles as a skillful application of scientific foreknowledge reduces Jesus to the status of a gifted conjuror in possession of a collection of impressive party tricks. That is the kind of ‘logic’ atheists use to undermine the status of Jesus as the son of God.
 
::[[User:AmandaBunting|AmandaBunting]] 19:51, 13 November 2010 (EST)
 
::[[User:AmandaBunting|AmandaBunting]] 19:51, 13 November 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
:::"Conjurer", not "conjuror", and I see sarcasm in your second paragraph that does not help your argument.  Why do you resist the position often taken by the [[KJV]], that Jesus's works were signs rather than "miracles"?  Truth does not have exceptions, and neither does logic.  The concept that God breaks laws from time to time is more problematic than the obvious truth that man has little understanding of nature to this day. 
 +
 +
:::I doubt [[Isaac Newton]] would have insisted that something is impossible under the laws of nature as you do.  Do you think you are better qualified than Newton to make such statements?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:38, 13 November 2010 (EST)
    
== What is not foreknowledge. ==
 
== What is not foreknowledge. ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,196

edits

Navigation menu