Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
"New" president edit
Line 43: Line 43:     
::Obama was criticized, and rightly so, for ''absolutely no executive experience''.  He had experience as a legislator, but had never actually held a job that required executive experience, running a company and meeting a payroll.  Since that criticism was rejected by the Obama camp, one would think it would be off-limits for them to use it against Rubio.  But since liberals don't think logically, and only care about smearing their opponents, as Andy said.....of course they will use it!  --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 01:08, 4 November 2010 (EDT)
 
::Obama was criticized, and rightly so, for ''absolutely no executive experience''.  He had experience as a legislator, but had never actually held a job that required executive experience, running a company and meeting a payroll.  Since that criticism was rejected by the Obama camp, one would think it would be off-limits for them to use it against Rubio.  But since liberals don't think logically, and only care about smearing their opponents, as Andy said.....of course they will use it!  --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 01:08, 4 November 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
== "New" president ==
 +
 +
I just made a minor edit, but have a feeling it may be contentious, so I'll explain a bit here. The opening sentence said the election is when the U.S. "picks a new president." I removed "new" because, inasmuch as it's likely that Obama will not be re-elected, it's still possible, meaning the country may not have a new president, but rather the same old one. [[User:EMorris|EMorris]] 13:34, 15 November 2010 (EST)

Navigation menu