Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
74 bytes added ,  04:40, November 16, 2010
Clarification
Line 12: Line 12:  
'''Both theories are baseless and absurd because there is no extrusive igneous activity in the area, and there is no evidence of volcanic activity in the area either'''.<ref>http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/deto/sec3.htm</ref>
 
'''Both theories are baseless and absurd because there is no extrusive igneous activity in the area, and there is no evidence of volcanic activity in the area either'''.<ref>http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/deto/sec3.htm</ref>
   −
Intelligent design explains the rock well: it is a work of art worth seeing.
+
Intelligent design explains the rock well: it is a work of art worth seeing, and does not require fictitious, irrational "explanations" of the origin.
    
The formation's official name contains no apostrophe due to a never-corrected clerical error.<ref>http://www.nps.gov/deto/naturescience/index.htm</ref>
 
The formation's official name contains no apostrophe due to a never-corrected clerical error.<ref>http://www.nps.gov/deto/naturescience/index.htm</ref>
21

edits

Navigation menu