nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 03:59, April 3, 2007
, 03:59, April 3, 2007no edit summary
*One might add that there isn't some codified "right" to belong anywhere on the Internet. Users removed for real or preceived violations are not abused in any manner. Fairness is what matters. If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:22, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
*One might add that there isn't some codified "right" to belong anywhere on the Internet. Users removed for real or preceived violations are not abused in any manner. Fairness is what matters. If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:22, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
:Also, repeated reverts, after a warning either on the Talk page of the article, or the users Talk page, should suffice for blocking grounds. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT)