2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 389:
Line 389: − *So, you are telling me you want the sites policy changed, and users banned for racist statements on talk pages, not in the article itself, correct? Are there any other types of statements you would like banned as well? Sexist? Gender biased? Calling someone a drunk? Stupid? I'd be more than happy to throw in with you, if you can provide specific outline, and agree on The Decider. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 00:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT)+ + +
→Racist Editor
: I think racism is a higher degree of offense than others. Action should be taken.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
: I think racism is a higher degree of offense than others. Action should be taken.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::So, you are telling me you want the sites policy changed, and users banned for racist statements on talk pages, not in the article itself, correct? Are there any other types of statements you would like banned as well? Sexist? Gender biased? Calling someone a drunk? Stupid? I'd be more than happy to throw in with you, if you can provide specific outline, and agree on The Decider. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 00:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
I see your point. Talk page racism is not as dangerous as article-page racism. Well argued. Perhaps, though, we should keep an eye on his edits to make sure no ''articles'' bear his stigma, and judging by his vehemence, he may not be someone we want around anyways.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 00:46, 3 April 2007 (EDT)