Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:     
I suppose the Administrator had it in his mind to redirect the talk page to the article in question because someone (a) created the talk page and whatever they wrote was deleted or (b) some other technical SEO reason.  Nevertheless, always a better move to actually ask the Admin involved (via a post on their page or directly emailing them, rather than slap delete templates all over the place, eh? --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 13:31, 17 November 2010 (EST)
 
I suppose the Administrator had it in his mind to redirect the talk page to the article in question because someone (a) created the talk page and whatever they wrote was deleted or (b) some other technical SEO reason.  Nevertheless, always a better move to actually ask the Admin involved (via a post on their page or directly emailing them, rather than slap delete templates all over the place, eh? --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 13:31, 17 November 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
:You are right and I apologize. I suppose I was just being a bit overzealous =D. On a similar note, do you think you could take a look at the [http://conservapedia.com/Special:DoubleRedirects double redirect list] and clean it up a bit? I would do it myself, but it appears that most (if not all) of the remaining ones are locked. Thanks for the advice! [[User:JimFullerton|JimFullerton]] 19:48, 17 November 2010 (EST)
296

edits

Navigation menu