Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 623: Line 623:  
::2) Wouldn't it be more appropriate to wait for Conservapedia to have an article about J. Edwin Orr before criticizing Wikipedia for not having one?  
 
::2) Wouldn't it be more appropriate to wait for Conservapedia to have an article about J. Edwin Orr before criticizing Wikipedia for not having one?  
   −
::3) Wikipedia's criteria for notability of people [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:BIO WP:BIO] are not based on the number of Google hits. I'd like TedM to point me to the relevant deletion discussion and indicate how J. Edwin Orr meets WP:BIO. Really, by far the most important criterion is the availability of good sources. If J. Edwin Orr meets the criteria in WP:BIO the article should not have been deleted and I'd be glad to propose it for deletion review. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:54, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::3) Wikipedia's criteria for notability of people, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:BIO WP:BIO] is not based on the number of Google hits. I'd like TedM to point me to the relevant deletion discussion and indicate how J. Edwin Orr meets WP:BIO. Really, by far the most important criterion is the availability of good sources. If J. Edwin Orr meets the criteria in WP:BIO the article should not have been deleted and I'd be glad to propose it for deletion review. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:54, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
4,994

edits

Navigation menu