nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 152:
Line 152: +
→Drug Use?: Information should be included in the story.
::Liberals might, who would wish, by employing their [[Liberal tricks]], to smear a Conservative politician by implying illegality where none existed. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:13, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
::Liberals might, who would wish, by employing their [[Liberal tricks]], to smear a Conservative politician by implying illegality where none existed. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:13, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
:::It's legal to have an abortion or an affair but I'm pretty sure if any politician had/did either one of those it'd be expected to be on their page as it's a pretty strong reflection on moral character. Why doesn't the same apply here? [[User:AdamV|AdamV]] 01:22, 7 December 2010 (EST)
:::It's legal to have an abortion or an affair but I'm pretty sure if any politician had/did either one of those it'd be expected to be on their page as it's a pretty strong reflection on moral character. Why doesn't the same apply here? [[User:AdamV|AdamV]] 01:22, 7 December 2010 (EST)
::::Trying marijuana once or twice isn't a reflection upon a persons moral character. Moral character is something developed over years, in living a life, in making mistakes and learning from them, in asking for help from Jesus, and being concerned, as the Politico story makes clear, of the kind of message decriminalizing the drug would send. I think most thinking Americans would find that story very appealing...and that is why Palin is so appealing to many Americans. I think that information should be included in her article. And Adam...did you see you were responding to a two-year-old thread? :P --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 06:24, 7 December 2010 (EST)
==Political Background==
==Political Background==