Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
207 bytes added ,  18:03, December 31, 2010
content
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Politicized science''' is considered a problem by people on all parts of the [[political spectrum]], yet they can rarely agree on whether a particular scientific issue has become politicized. All parties to the dispute agree that when political power, as of a government or church, is used to prevent scientific matters from being investigated or discussed objectively, this constitutes politicization. Even scientific bodies have been known to suppress results or theories which contradict the scientific mainstream.
+
'''Politicized science''' is the mis-use of [[science]], usually in the form of [[atheism|atheistic]] [[junk science]], to further [[liberal]] public policy. Examples of politicized science used by liberals are the racist theory of [[Eugenics]], used to support forced sterilization of "defectives", as well as prolonged race segregation and discrimination, and [[global warming]] theories which are being used to promote a massive redistribution of wealth and/or a severe rationing of energy consumption (see [[Kyoto Protocol]]).
   −
* Most Americans take pride in our traditions of [[free speech]], [[freedom of the press]] and open [[scientific inquiry]] and [[debate]]. However, if [[research]] is done in a [[bias]]ed way, it is not [[science]], it is [[propaganda]]. When science becomes politicized, with unspoken [[hidden agenda]]s, it loses its value as a trusted source of [[objectivity|objective information]] to inform our country’s discourse and decisions. It becomes a political tool, a weapon to [[manipulation|manipulate]] an unsuspecting public. [http://thewaronintimacy.com/twoi/]
+
* Most Americans take pride in our traditions of [[free speech]], [[freedom of the press]] and open [[scientific inquiry]] and [[debate]]. However, if [[research]] is done in a [[bias]]ed way, it is not [[science]], it is [[propaganda]]. When science becomes politicized, with unspoken [[hidden agenda]]s, it loses its value as a trusted source of [[objectivity|objective information]] to inform our country’s discourse and decisions. It becomes a political tool, a weapon to [[manipulation|manipulate]] an unsuspecting public. [http://thewaronintimacy.com/twoi/] Consequently the rigid disciplne and [[logic]] of [[creation science]] is gaining in importance, enabling intelligent people to distinguish real science from atheistic secular politicized science.
    
[[Sallie Baliunas]] wrote
 
[[Sallie Baliunas]] wrote

Navigation menu