32
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 470:
Line 470: + + + +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 19:47, December 31, 2010
, 19:47, December 31, 2010→Would the Dating of Ice Mummy be accurate?: new section
: Griffirg, what is valid at the atomic level is presumptively valid at larger scales also. Or would you observe an apple falling from a tree and then claim that says nothing about planetary motion?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:23, 13 November 2010 (EST)
: Griffirg, what is valid at the atomic level is presumptively valid at larger scales also. Or would you observe an apple falling from a tree and then claim that says nothing about planetary motion?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:23, 13 November 2010 (EST)
== Would the Dating of Ice Mummy be accurate? ==
I'm all for the ice mummy confirming the Great Flood but I thought scientific dating methods were, for the most part, based on flawed assumptions. Correct me if I'm wrong here, because now that I think of it, fluctuations in the rate of decay may have occurred during the flood and have remained stable since the time of this Ice mummy.