Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)

Revision as of 01:27, January 2, 2011

263 bytes added ,  01:27, January 2, 2011
→‎Would the Dating of Ice Mummy be accurate?: No, the short term dating was not effective with the Shroud of Turin, because the sample had been contaminated. This defect was thoroughly demonst
Line 480: Line 480:     
::No you're right Mr. Schlafly.  Just as short term dating was effective with the Shroud of Turin, I don't see why it wouldn't also be effective here.[[User:RianB|RMBchillin]] 16:08, 1 January 2011 (EST)
 
::No you're right Mr. Schlafly.  Just as short term dating was effective with the Shroud of Turin, I don't see why it wouldn't also be effective here.[[User:RianB|RMBchillin]] 16:08, 1 January 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
:::No, the short term dating was not effective with the [[Shroud of Turin]], because the sample had been contaminated.  This defect was thoroughly demonstrated in a scientific, peer-reviewed article.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:27, 1 January 2011 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/836755"

Navigation menu