152
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 666:
Line 666: + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 19:24, April 3, 2007
, 19:24, April 3, 2007→Item #3
::"Pro-pornography bias"? Adding the word bias to anything that you're not a fan of does not make it a bias. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 15:17, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::"Pro-pornography bias"? Adding the word bias to anything that you're not a fan of does not make it a bias. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 15:17, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:: How is a judge, any judge, who recognizes that there is no way to regulate pornography without infringing upon the first amendment necessarily Liberal<sup>TM</sup>? Furthermore, if Liberals<sup>TM</sup> are supposed to be these big mean totaliarian socialists, how does that mesh with a laissez-faire attitude to Pornography? Please explain this, I'm eager to see how these problems are reconciled, because if you cannot, I regret to inform you I'm likely to become under the impression that youre just being silly.
:: ...Uh oh, I'm going to be banned for using the word Laissez-faire on cold blood aren't I? I'm sorry, I didnt realize it was European. I didnt mean to inflict the tongue of the unwashed foreigners on the masses like that.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 15:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)