Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 168: Line 168:     
::BTW: You didn't say before that you "found the definition unacceptable", you said that you "didn't see a definition". If you had said why you found the definition unacceptable, we could have had a short cut. [[User:order|Order]] 3 April, 11:20 AEST
 
::BTW: You didn't say before that you "found the definition unacceptable", you said that you "didn't see a definition". If you had said why you found the definition unacceptable, we could have had a short cut. [[User:order|Order]] 3 April, 11:20 AEST
 +
 +
::: It's self-evident that the number of conservatives in a population is going to effect its degree of "liberal bias."  Your attempt to ignore it is like trying to determine the pH of a solution by looking only at acid OR base added, not both.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:31, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== Re: #6 (Great Flood) ==
 
== Re: #6 (Great Flood) ==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,482

edits

Navigation menu