Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Please read Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks before making any more edits.
Line 11: Line 11:     
[http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=TXg4AAAAEBAJ&dq=patent:4612050&as_drrb_ap=q&as_minm_ap=0&as_miny_ap=&as_maxm_ap=0&as_maxy_ap=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is= US patent # 4,612,050], "A liquid sodium silicate composition for application to wood for artifically petrifying the wood..."  The patent number was clearly listed on [http://www.nwcreation.net/young.html the source given].  I'm also quite concerned about giving good arguments, but I would very strongly recommend looking at the source first. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 23:37, 15 December 2009 (EST)
 
[http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=TXg4AAAAEBAJ&dq=patent:4612050&as_drrb_ap=q&as_minm_ap=0&as_miny_ap=&as_maxm_ap=0&as_maxy_ap=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is= US patent # 4,612,050], "A liquid sodium silicate composition for application to wood for artifically petrifying the wood..."  The patent number was clearly listed on [http://www.nwcreation.net/young.html the source given].  I'm also quite concerned about giving good arguments, but I would very strongly recommend looking at the source first. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 23:37, 15 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
==Admin Warning==
 +
 +
We have a rule here agains making [[personal remarks]]. If you object to someone's contribution, don't say "Why is he allowed to violate rules?" (That implies that he '''has already done so'''.)
 +
 +
Instead, point out the specific edit(s) you object to, along with your reasoning. Better yet, provide an alternative.
 +
 +
Continued personal remarks will result in a permanent ban. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:43, 3 January 2011 (EST)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu