| | OldRight, Can you give us some background on the dispute in WP, that may be of interest elesewhere. Thanks. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 10:40, 12 July 2007 (EDT) | | OldRight, Can you give us some background on the dispute in WP, that may be of interest elesewhere. Thanks. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 10:40, 12 July 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | Often confused, an absolute (non constitutional) monarch with right of ascension is distinct form a dictator, even if they behave dictatorially. All of the country, people and property, and all the laws are subjects of the monarch who may change them. Such a monarch may be ambivalent, aggressive, abusive, passive, kind, cruel, have secret police, etc, but if they are a a monarch with hereditary ascension rights, they are not a dictator. Note, much of the list, with 2-3 errors, or instance where someone has declared themselves king, refers to presidents, party secretaries, generals, prime ministers, shoguns, chancellors, etc. |