Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
439 bytes removed ,  23:26, January 6, 2011
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''Evolution and science''' have some things in common, but otherwise are in conflict on several points. Darwinists say that the [[theory of evolution]] is scientific and that no other theory is worthy of consideration. This in itself is anti-scientific, because science has always progressed by exposing every existing theory to criticism and testing and welcoming any new theory which can explain known phenomena.
 
'''Evolution and science''' have some things in common, but otherwise are in conflict on several points. Darwinists say that the [[theory of evolution]] is scientific and that no other theory is worthy of consideration. This in itself is anti-scientific, because science has always progressed by exposing every existing theory to criticism and testing and welcoming any new theory which can explain known phenomena.
   −
'''Tests of the Theory'''
+
 
----
  −
A scientific theory must by definition be falsifiable.  It must make a prediction that can be shown through observation to be right or wrong.  The theory of evolution is arguably one of the most thoroughly tested theories.  Every excavation into ancient rock is a fresh opportunity to disprove the theory.  If a fossilized monkey were discovered in Jurassic Rock the theory of evolution would be on the block for a major revision. 
         
[[Category:Science]]
 
[[Category:Science]]
 +
[[Category: Evolution]]
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910

edits

Navigation menu