83
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + +
content
'''Evolution and science''' have some things in common, but otherwise are in conflict on several points. Darwinists say that the [[theory of evolution]] is scientific and that no other theory is worthy of consideration [[evolution|despite its lack of evidence and the abundant evidence showing it to be false.]] This is anti-scientific, because science has always progressed by exposing every existing theory to criticism and testing and welcoming any new theory which can explain known phenomena.
'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]].
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid [[logic]] of [[creation science]].
==References==
<references/>
[[Category:Science]]
[[Category:Science]]
[[Category: Evolution]]
[[Category: Evolution]]