18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
reply
::No, Daniel, your satire would not "be considered substantive." Try doing some encyclopedic editing, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:12, 12 January 2011 (EST)
::No, Daniel, your satire would not "be considered substantive." Try doing some encyclopedic editing, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:12, 12 January 2011 (EST)
:::Understood, sorry for my mistake, from looking around the site I thought satire was considered substantive, given how much space is devoted to it. I will concentrate on substantive encyclopedic edits from now on. PS. Why did you censor my comment on talk:mainpage? [[User:DanielG|DanielG]] 11:20, 12 January 2011 (EST)