Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Radiometric dating (view source)

Revision as of 20:41, January 16, 2011

314 bytes added ,  20:41, January 16, 2011
there is no logical reason to expect physical constants to have remained unchanged over the lifetime of the universe. It took me only about 60 seconds to find one example
Line 167: Line 167:     
Can I also make a note that a single case of someone saying that they observed a change of half life in the lab is by no means conclusive, and would have been rechecked by other experts in the field. If a true change was observed, then it would be major news in any peer reviewed publication.--[[User:EdBryson|EdBryson]] 14:57, 16 January 2011 (EST)
 
Can I also make a note that a single case of someone saying that they observed a change of half life in the lab is by no means conclusive, and would have been rechecked by other experts in the field. If a true change was observed, then it would be major news in any peer reviewed publication.--[[User:EdBryson|EdBryson]] 14:57, 16 January 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
: Ed, there is no logical reason to expect physical constants to have remained unchanged over the lifetime of the universe. It took me only about 60 seconds to find one example: [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html "Speed of light may have changed recently."]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,911

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/841190"

Navigation menu