152
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 325:
Line 325: + + Line 331:
Line 333: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:00, April 4, 2007
, 02:00, April 4, 2007→Item #3
::::: In the U.S., the liberal Warren Court (please don't doubt that the Warren Court was liberal) struck down laws against pornography in dozens of cases. Since then, the liberal Justices consistently rule in favor of pornography, and the conservative Justices tend to rule in favor of laws against pornography. In terms of politicians, liberals support the ACLU (which defends pornography) while conservatives oppose both.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::::: In the U.S., the liberal Warren Court (please don't doubt that the Warren Court was liberal) struck down laws against pornography in dozens of cases. Since then, the liberal Justices consistently rule in favor of pornography, and the conservative Justices tend to rule in favor of laws against pornography. In terms of politicians, liberals support the ACLU (which defends pornography) while conservatives oppose both.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::I'm not trying to impugn what I'm sure is impeccable and thoroughly cited research on your part, but can you show what these findings are and how they are specifically "in favor of pornography" and not simply, say, recognizing that theres no way to limit the first amendment rights of Larry Flynt for instance? Thats not exactly pro-porn as much as it is anti-censorship. Are you conflating the two without saying so? If you were, would that be intellectually dishonest?--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 22:00, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Maybe you can explain this puzzle. Conservatives freely admit their views and sincerely defend their principles. Why do so many liberals deny they are liberal, deny basic liberal positions, and seek to pretend there is not a liberal bias?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::: Maybe you can explain this puzzle. Conservatives freely admit their views and sincerely defend their principles. Why do so many liberals deny they are liberal, deny basic liberal positions, and seek to pretend there is not a liberal bias?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::::: That's not true. Here is an explanation of [[conservatives]]. It is based on morality. Demonizing liberals has nothing to do with it. Liberals demonize conservatives far more than vice versa. Compare the behavior of liberals and conservatives here, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::::: That's not true. Here is an explanation of [[conservatives]]. It is based on morality. Demonizing liberals has nothing to do with it. Liberals demonize conservatives far more than vice versa. Compare the behavior of liberals and conservatives here, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::: "Liberals demonize conservatives far more than vice versa?" Can you name five bestselling books by any liberal authors at all that do nothing but attack conservatives? Because if not, I rather think there's at the very lease a Coulter-sized hole in your argument there, Kreskin.
:::::: For the record, I was kind of trying to parody how you just decide to define what liberalism is in terms of that which you don't agree with, in this case pornography. Unsurprisingly, you failed to catch it.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 22:00, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
If there is a bias, there is a "factual" bias, or a bias against bad science, in the mainstream.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
If there is a bias, there is a "factual" bias, or a bias against bad science, in the mainstream.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)