4,542
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
no edit summary
I don't think that this should be slapped on articles indiscriminately as has been done tonight. There should be some form of discussion. As those of you who read Andy's talk page know, I am not a big fan of templates except when needed, and one could argue that every article of substance on this site is biased in one way or another. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 00:30, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
I don't think that this should be slapped on articles indiscriminately as has been done tonight. There should be some form of discussion. As those of you who read Andy's talk page know, I am not a big fan of templates except when needed, and one could argue that every article of substance on this site is biased in one way or another. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 00:30, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:The template is sort of redundant, considering we're ''supposed'' to have a bias here. I'm inclined to change it so say ''Anti-Christian Bias'', and of course, it would be misused. I say delete it, combinations of other tags will do just fine. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:32, 4 April 2007 (EDT)