| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Peer review''' in general refers to submitting scientific work to the scrutiny of other scientists, especially before making announcements to the general public. | + | '''Peer review''' in general refers to submitting scientific work to the scrutiny of other scientists, especially before making announcements to the general public. It has been found to be rooted in the Biblical tradition and is a proper Christian conduct.<ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v1/n1/theology-peer-review Theology of Peer Review], Answer: Research Journal</ref> |
| | | | |
| | In common practice, peer review is synonymous with [[anonymous peer review]], a largely secretive process whereby referees review a scientific paper in strict confidence before an editor accepts the paper for publication. Ordinarily, this process will catch subtle errors in scientific work. When the stakes are high, however, it is easy to abuse the process. | | In common practice, peer review is synonymous with [[anonymous peer review]], a largely secretive process whereby referees review a scientific paper in strict confidence before an editor accepts the paper for publication. Ordinarily, this process will catch subtle errors in scientific work. When the stakes are high, however, it is easy to abuse the process. |
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | | | |
| | A controversial form of peer review is when physicians on the staff of a hospital pass judgment on a fellow physician, and recommend that he be excluded from the medical staff. This has potential for abuse to eliminate competitors, which is known as [[sham peer review]]. | | A controversial form of peer review is when physicians on the staff of a hospital pass judgment on a fellow physician, and recommend that he be excluded from the medical staff. This has potential for abuse to eliminate competitors, which is known as [[sham peer review]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Theology of Peer Review== |
| | + | |
| | + | In a landmark paper, the process of peer review has been established by many scholars <ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v1/n1/theology-peer-review Theology of Peer Review], Answer: Research Journal</ref> as rooted in several [[Christian]] [[virtue]]s, such as: |
| | + | * reflecting [[Christ]] |
| | + | * being [[honest]] |
| | + | * seeking [[wisdom]] |
| | + | * humbly submitting |
| | + | * showing Christian [[love]] |
| | + | * correcting error, and |
| | + | * being accountable |
| | + | |
| | + | In accordance to this, several peer reviewed [[creationist]] journals such as [[Answers Research Journal]], Creation Research Society Quarterly, Journal of Creation, Occasional Papers of the BSG, Proceedings of the National Creationist Institute, and Origins have been created despite the scorn and ridicule from [[liberal]] [[professors]]. |
| | | | |
| | ==Abuses by the IPCC== | | ==Abuses by the IPCC== |