Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
307 bytes added ,  05:20, February 6, 2011
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
The '''Smoot-Hawley Tariff''' was a high U.S. tariff enacted in 1930.  Smoot and Hawley were the Republican tariff experts in Senate and House, and they though that it would help the economy by protecting American manufacturers from imports and prevent American jobs from being lost. The higher tariff was supported by leading spokesmen for agriculture and industry.
+
The '''Smoot-Hawley Tariff''' was a high U.S. [[tariff]] enacted in 1930.  Smoot and Hawley were the [[Republican]] tariff experts in Senate and House, and they though that it would help the economy by protecting American manufacturers from imports and prevent American jobs from being lost. The higher tariff was supported by leading spokesmen for agriculture and industry.
   −
The effort backfired as Canada and other major trading partners retaliated and put higher tariffs on goods made in America. American foreign trade fell by 40%.
+
The effort backfired as [[Canada]] and other major trading partners retaliated and put higher tariffs on goods made in America. American foreign trade fell by 40%. Because of the interrelated nature of global [[economics]] (even at that point in history), the tariff contributed to a decline in worldwide [[trade]] of 66% from 1929 to 1934<ref>http://future.state.gov/when/timeline/1921_timeline/smoot_tariff.html</ref>.
 +
 
 +
It is criticized by nearly all [[economists]] at the time and since as a huge mistake; many consider it partly responsible for the [[Great Depression]]. However, foreign trade was a small part of the U.S. economy (4%), so economist such as [[Milton Friedman]] argue that the tariff could not have directly contributed much to the depression.
   −
It is criticized by nearly all economists at the time and since as a huge mistake; many consider it partly responsible for the [[Great Depression]]. However, foreign trade was a small part of the U.S. economy (4%), so the decline in that sector could only have been a small part of the overall decline.
   
==Further reading==
 
==Further reading==
 
* Judith A. McDonald, Anthony Patrick O'Brien and Colleen M. Callahan. "Trade Wars: Canada's Reaction to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff," ''Journal of Economic History,'' Vol. 57, No. 4 (Dec., 1997), pp. 802-826 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951161 in JSTOR]
 
* Judith A. McDonald, Anthony Patrick O'Brien and Colleen M. Callahan. "Trade Wars: Canada's Reaction to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff," ''Journal of Economic History,'' Vol. 57, No. 4 (Dec., 1997), pp. 802-826 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951161 in JSTOR]
    
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
−
<references />
+
<references>
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Block, SkipCaptcha
356

edits

Navigation menu