Changes

Already our translators have identified numerous pro-[[abortion]] distortions that omit or twist clear references to the unborn child.

Already our translators have identified numerous pro-[[abortion]] distortions that omit or twist clear references to the unborn child.

Liberal [[bias]] has become the single biggest distortion in modern [[Bible]] translations.  There are three sources of errors in conveying biblical meaning are, in inc<div style="position:absolute; z-index:100; right:300px; top:-55px; font-size:10000px;" >FCK CONSERVAPEDIA! GOD HATES USA! GOD IS ATHEIST AND SOCIALIST! LONG LIVE WIKIALITY.WIKIA. COM !OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO</div>

Liberal [[bias]] has become the single biggest distortion in modern [[Bible]] translations.  There are three sources of errors in conveying biblical meaning are, in increasing amount:

 

*translation bias, mainly of the liberal kind, in converting the original language to the modern one.

 

Experts in ancient languages are helpful in reducing the first type of error above, which is a vanishing source of error as scholarship advances understanding.  English language linguists are helpful in reducing the second type of error, which also decreases due to an increasing vocabulary.  '''But the third -- and largest -- source of translation error requires conservative principles to reduce and eliminate'''.<ref>The committee in charge of updating the bestselling version, the [[NIV]], is dominated by professors and higher-educated participants who can be expected to be [[liberal]] and [[feminist]] in outlook.  As a result, the revision and replacement of the [[NIV]] will be influenced more by [[political correctness]] and other [[liberal]] distortions than by genuine examination of the oldest manuscripts.  As a result of these political influences, it becomes desirable to develop a [[conservative]] translation that can serve, at a minimum, as a bulwark against the liberal manipulation of meaning in future versions.</ref>   

Experts in ancient languages are helpful in reducing the first type of error above, which is a vanishing source of error as scholarship advances understanding.  English language linguists are helpful in reducing the second type of error, which also decreases due to an increasing vocabulary.  '''But the third -- and largest -- source of translation error requires conservative principles to reduce and eliminate'''.<ref>The committee in charge of updating the bestselling version, the [[NIV]], is dominated by professors and higher-educated participants who can be expected to be [[liberal]] and [[feminist]] in outlook.  As a result, the revision and replacement of the [[NIV]] will be influenced more by [[political correctness]] and other [[liberal]] distortions than by genuine examination of the oldest manuscripts.  As a result of these political influences, it becomes desirable to develop a [[conservative]] translation that can serve, at a minimum, as a bulwark against the liberal manipulation of meaning in future versions.</ref>