Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + +
We can't eliminate the researcher's bias but we can neutralize its effect
* ... there are no scientifically rigorous outcome studies to determine either the actual efficacy or harm of "reparative" treatments. <ref>http://www.aglp.org/pages/position.html#Anchor-55000 Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists</ref>
* ... there are no scientifically rigorous outcome studies to determine either the actual efficacy or harm of "reparative" treatments. <ref>http://www.aglp.org/pages/position.html#Anchor-55000 Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists</ref>
A historian of science and the church writes:
* [[Scientific method]]s are not intended to eliminate the researcher's bias (which is impossible), but to neutralize the effect of these biases on the final results of the research.<ref> [http://www.scientus.org/Sarton-Isis-Bias.html George Sarton, Isis and Historian Bias]</ref>
==Funding==
==Funding==