Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
2:
 
2:
   −
3: I do not consider him to be overrated as even though he may have had his flaws, no one has none and despite them he was a great pioneer of exploration.  
+
3: I do not consider him to be overrated as even though he may have had his flaws, no one doesn't, and despite them he was a great pioneer of exploration.  
    
4: one could argue that the puritans set up a government that was controlled to a higher degree by the church than the government in England. They did not disagree with church run government, just the specific church that ran the English government.
 
4: one could argue that the puritans set up a government that was controlled to a higher degree by the church than the government in England. They did not disagree with church run government, just the specific church that ran the English government.
Line 23: Line 23:  
2:  
 
2:  
   −
3: with respect to the triangle trade, I think the economic profit of getting slaves would have been reason enough to make the journey to Africa to get the slaves. So I think that the triangle trade did in fact exist.
+
3: with respect to the triangle trade, I think the economic profit of selling slaves would have been reason enough to make the journey to Africa aquire them. So I think that the triangle trade did in fact exist.
    
4:
 
4:

Navigation menu