Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply re: freedom of association
Line 4: Line 4:     
[[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]]
 
[[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]]
 +
 +
:Good points, but isn't freedom of association a moral right as well as a constitutional one?
 +
 +
:Let's take an analogy.  Suppose the leader of a church decides to expel or excommunicate someone, and you were asked if he was "right" to do so.  Isn't the ordinary answer: "yes, under the authority of his leadership!"
 +
 +
:In other words, it seems to me that groups typically have an inherent right to decide who can remain in the group.  It's an automatically "right" if done in a manner consistent with its authority and without any odious discrimination, isn't it?
 +
 +
:Even you disagree, the fundamental right of freedom of association should be addressed carefully in any attempt to declare an exercise of that freedom to be wrong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:23, 14 February 2011 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu