3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 279:
Line 279: + +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 19:14, February 26, 2011
, 19:14, February 26, 2011no edit summary
::::To our credit, I think I can say that we at least '''mention''' the views we disagree with, and usually even give the evidence and reasoning that the supporters of those views have advanced. We here, unlike the biased majority at Wikipedia, trust our readers to tell the difference between science and pseudoscience, objective fact and propaganda. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:40, 15 August 2010 (EDT)
::::To our credit, I think I can say that we at least '''mention''' the views we disagree with, and usually even give the evidence and reasoning that the supporters of those views have advanced. We here, unlike the biased majority at Wikipedia, trust our readers to tell the difference between science and pseudoscience, objective fact and propaganda. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:40, 15 August 2010 (EDT)
If CP becomes the new wikipedia, then it will be a sad world indeed.--[[User:LordDagon|LordDagon]] 14:14, 26 February 2011 (EST)