10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
no edit summary
==I find this article offensive==
I find the line "Divorce affects more than the spouses; it also causes pain for any children from the marriage where the non-custodial parent is often seen less often or in some cases not at all. It is common for children to blame themselves for the divorce. Relationship difficulties for the children are especially common into later life if either of the parents is poisoning the relationship with the children for the other by making negative comments to the kids." I am the child of a divorced couple and I do not appreciate the view that my parents' divorce will somehow make me grow up emotionally challenged. I do not blame myself for the divorce. Trust me, if my parents did not get a divorce, life would be a lot worse for all three of us - the preceding year to the divorce was complete agony. They were arguing all the time, and I, personally, am glad that they don't have to do that anymore. The divorce has given them great relief, as they no longer have to live with people they hate, and it has also given ''me'' great relief, as I no longer have to watch the two most important people in my life screaming at each other. I suggest the line be removed from the article. -[[User:BLeeser|BLeeser]]
==Biblical view==
==Biblical view==
I don't understand the position in the "Biblical view" section. Is it really claiming that '''divorce''' is adultery and thus a sin, or that sex/marriage '''after''' divorce is adultery, that the divorce didn't change anything, and that therefore the divorced couple are still married in the eyes of God? --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 03:57, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
I don't understand the position in the "Biblical view" section. Is it really claiming that '''divorce''' is adultery and thus a sin, or that sex/marriage '''after''' divorce is adultery, that the divorce didn't change anything, and that therefore the divorced couple are still married in the eyes of God? --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 03:57, 20 March 2007 (EDT)